1. Click Start, and launch the Control Panel.
2. Click Ease of Access.
3. Click Change how your keyboard works.
4. Locate the Make it easier to use keyboard shortcuts section.
5. Enable the Underline keyboard shortcuts and access keys checkbox.
6. Click OK.

That’s it. After that change, menus will reveal which characters are accelerator keys by underlining them, just like in older versions of Windows.

Despite these mouse-powered shortcuts, I’ve always felt that keyboard shortcuts were faster. With that in mind, I took my search to Google, and eventually and found what I was looking for:

CTRL + SHIFT + N

Great shortcut… after you press it, you can immediately start typing the folder name. No need to use the mouse in between creating the folder, and typing the name. There’s just one unfortunate catch – the shortcut only works in Windows 7. Seeing as I needed something that worked across Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, and Windows 7, I returned to Google for an alternative. Here’s what I found:

ALT + FWF

Certainly an awkward looking shortcut, but it works just like CTRL + SHIFT + N. The only difference is that it uses accelerator keys, a long-supported feature of Windows. Back in Windows Server 2003, accelerator keys were easy to recognize visually:

Notice that certain characters are underlined in the menus?

All you had to do was look for underlined letters in the menu options. As can be seen above, the File menu option has the F key associated. If you hold ALT, the key combination you press will be sent to the menu bar. This also works in Windows Vista, and Windows 7 – though, by default, the underlined letters and menu bar are hidden. So, for example, you can follow the ALT + FWF path. Holding ALT, first press F to select File, then W for New, and F for Folder. After that, just type the name of the new folder, and press ENTER.

Interested in making the underlined letters always visible in Windows 7? If so, read How to Restore Underlined Shortcuts in Menus.

Snipping Tool (Windows Vista only)

I was surprised to discover a new screen capture tool from Microsoft, already preloaded on my Vista machine… sounded cool. When you run it, it grays out the screen, and the interface pops up:

The Snipping Tool interface

You can then drag the cursor and select an area to capture. It even has “free-form”, “rectangular”, “full-screen”, and “window” selection modes.

Selecting the are to capture with Snipping Tool

Whatever you select is then presented to you, and you have the option of saving it in a number of formats. Not bad, Microsoft, not bad. Unfortunately, there is no way to capture the cursor. I was starting to wonder if this was particularly difficult to achieve. I found a webpage that mentions the following:

Because of the way graphic interfaces work, your cursor usually isn’t captured in an image. Pressing the Print Screen key will not capture your cursor. But all commercial programs that do captures do have some kind of option to capture the cursor.

But there’s a trick—screen capture programs can’t really see the cursor, either. So what they must do is add their own special cursor, and because cursors change shape, if you want a special cursor, you need to tell the program what cursor to capture. Each program has its own way to do this.

Funny thing is, I had that approach in mind – achieving it via image manipulation, but I wanted to avoid it, since it isn’t a convenient long-term solution. Reading what he had to say really made me want to know how the cursor works altogether – why is it so different? I’ll take some time to look into that, and will write a post about it afterwards. For now, back to the tools:

Jing

Jing is actually from TechSmith, the same guys that make SnagIt. Interestingly, they have a free version to offer. I found the interface particularly unique, unlike anything I’ve seen before.  It features a “sun” icon that you can place anywhere on the outer bounds of your screen. Once placed, when you hover over the icon, it expands to show you more controls, as seen here:

Left: The sun icon being dragged ; Right: Extra controls upon hover

 To get a better idea of what the application really looks like, check out their entertaining intro video.  Put simply, Jing allows you to capture part or all of your desktop as either an image or a video. It then gives you options to annotate, and all-that; but he’s the cool part. You can automatically upload your recorded videos (which include audio) to a website, which then allows you to easily share it via a link.

Unfortunately for me, Jing’s screenshot functionality didn’t include the mouse cursor. After discovering this, with yet another application, an interesting idea popped into my head. Surely, the video feature would feature the mouse cursor – otherwise the video feature would be pretty useless. I tested my theory, and I was right. So, theoretically, I could take a screenshot of a video, and then I’d have the mouse cursor captured as well. Sneaky, I know – but it did the trick.

So, all-in-all, I didn’t find a tool that did exactly what I wanted, but the “take a screenshot of the video” idea was actually easy enough to do – so I’ll probably use that approach whenever necessary; that is, until I give in to SnagIt.

Here’s how it works. You know how you can normally close a window by clicking on the top right corner? The “X” button? Well, you can also double-click on the top left corner, and this will usually also close the window.

The reason I say “usually” is because some newer applications, like Google Chrome, for example – are not using the conventional windows style. Aside from a few exceptions, I’ve seen this work across XP, Server 2000, Server 2003, and Vista operating systems. It’s just a little weird in Vista, seeing as they don’t display the icon in the top left corner like they used to. 

Single-clicking the top left corner actually brings up a menu:

My guess is that Windows will automatically execute the action written in bold when you double-click, which is Close.

A little research revealed that this feature was initially the only way to close a window in Windows 3.1. Jensen Harris, Group Program Manager of the Microsoft Office User Experience Team, explained it on his blog:

Anyway, in Windows 95 the close box was added to the upper-right corner, but they kept the ability to close windows by double-clicking the product icon on the left side of the title bar. As a result, even some whippersnappers like me who barely remember computers pre-Windows 95 learned to close windows that way.

Whoops, I let out my big secret.

You see, I’m a left-side double-click closer myself. It’s embarrassing, I know, but I just can’t break the habit. Oh so many times during the beta of Office I’ve moved my mouse to the upper-left corner, realized that I couldn’t close the window, and then jumped to the other side of the screen to hit the close box.

We removed left-side close as a planned experiment. If people could get used to closing on the right side, we’d be better off because there wouldn’t be two ways of doing the same simple action. Clearly if we were building a new window manager from scratch with no pre-existing users, we would only have one way to close windows.

But, of course, we have hundreds of millions of users, many of which (like me) literally have left-side close burned into the lower levels of our brain stem, along with breathing and keeping the heart beating. Honestly, I can seem to relearn anything except for this.

Nonetheless, we tried taking this out–we shipped Beta 1 Technical Refresh and Beta 2 this way and waited for feedback. Could people adapt? Not really, as it turns out.

Honestly, we knew all along that there was a strong possibility we would have to find a way to add this functionality back. It was worth a shot, but in the end, creating an affordance for left-side closing eliminates one huge annoyance that stands in the way of some people’s enjoyment of the product.

Like Harris, I too feel like I’m hanging on to an old habit. In Windows Vista, I see that Microsoft is no longer including an icon in that corner in some core places – that, to me, communicates their intention to discourage widespread use of the feature. After all, why would we want multiple ways to close a window with the mouse?